Why the study?
Striatin gene variants are associated with increased blood pressure and aldosterone on a liberal salt diet, but whether mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists provide superior blood pressure reduction over nonspecific anti-hypertensive therapy in risk allele carriers is unknown.
Does eplerenone reduce blood pressure more than amlodipine in hypertensive adults with STRN risk alleles?
Does eplerenone reduce blood pressure more than amlodipine in hypertensive adults with STRN risk alleles?
This study design outlines a proof-of-concept trial to determine if genetic biomarkers (STRN risk alleles) can identify hypertensive individuals highly responsive to eplerenone compared to amlodipine.
OBJECTIVES: In human studies and genetically altered mouse studies, variants in the striatin gene (STRN) are associated with increased blood pressure (BP) and aldosterone on a liberal salt diet. This clinical trial is based on the presumed mechanism for striatin-associated HTN - increased aldosterone. It is designed to determine if participants with the STRN risk alleles will have a greater BP reduction on a liberal salt diet with a specific, mechanism-based therapy - a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone - as compared with a nonspecific anti-hypertensive therapy - amlodipine. METHODS: One hundred five hypertensive adults with the STRN risk alleles (SNP rs2540923 carriers or rs888083 homozygotes) will be enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, dose-escalation, clinical trial. After a minimum 2-week washout period and baseline assessment of BP on a liberal salt diet, participants will be randomized to either daily eplerenone or amlodipine. Participants will take daily at-home BP recordings as a safety check. After 4 and 8 weeks of drug therapy, BP will be measured by the study team and medication will be increased, if needed, to achieve a participant goal BP of <140/90 mmHg.Anticipated results We anticipate that STRN risk allele carriers will demonstrate a greater reduction in BP with eplerenone and will require a lower dose of eplerenone to reach goal BP as compared with amlodipine. CONCLUSION: This is a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Positive results support the feasibility of performing genetically-defined, mechanistically-driven trials in HTN. Clinically, it would suggest that genetic biomarkers can identify individuals highly responsive to specific treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stone et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: