Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The segmental ligand bis{1-ethyl-2-[6‘-carboxy)pyridin-2‘-yl]benzimidazol-5-yl}methane (L C ) reacts with the entire series of Ln III ions to yield a new class of neutral lanthanide carboxylates, the triple-stranded dimetallic helicates [Ln 2 (L C -2H) 3 ], which are stable in water in the pH range 4−13. A competitive titration with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane- N, N ‘,N ‘ ‘,N ‘ ‘ ‘ -tetraacetic acid (dota) shows the Eu III helicate to have a stability comparable to that of [Eu(dota)] - . According to the X-ray structures of isotypical [Ln 2 (L C -2H) 3 ]·20.5H 2 O (Ln = Eu, Tb) (C 93 H 72 Ln 2 N 18 O 12 ·20.5H 2 O, monoclinic, P 2 1 / c, Z = 8), the helicates are comprised of two types of slightly different molecules (A, B) within the asymmetric unit. The three ligand strands are helically wrapped around the two nine-coordinate Ln III ions, leading to pseudo- D 3 symmetries around the metals. The Ln III −Ln III distances lie in the ranges 8.81−8.83 Å for molecules A and 9.04−9.07 Å for molecules B, while the helical pitch amounts to 23.7−23.8 Å (A) and 24.5−24.7 Å (B). In solution, the helicates retain time-averaged D 3 symmetries along the entire Ln III series, as shown by 1 H and 13 C NMR. The derivation of equations adapted to heterodimetallic complexes allows the separation of contact and dipolar contributions to the isotropic paramagnetic shift. Somewhat different structures are evidenced between larger (Ln = Ce−Tb) and smaller (Ln = Er−Yb) Ln III ions, attributed to a lengthening of the helix on going toward heavier lanthanides. The photophysical properties of the helicates depend on the nature of the Ln III ion, and L C is revealed to be a good sensitizer of Eu III . The flexible route used to synthesize L C opens interesting perspectives for the fine-tuning of the chemical and photophysical properties of lanthanide-containing homodimetallic helicates with potential applications in labeling and sensing technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhabiri et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: