This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Building upon an earlier study of heme-nitrosyl complexes ( Inorg. Chem . 2023, 62, 20496–20505), we examined a wide range of nonheme {FeNO} 6–10 complexes (the superscript represents the Enemark-Feltham count) and two dinitrosyl iron complexes using DMRG-CASSCF calculations. Analysis of the wave functions in terms of resonance forms with different [π*(NO)] i occupancies (where i = 0–4 for mononitrosyl complexes) identified the dominant electronic configurations of {FeNO} 6 and {FeNO} 7 complexes as Fe III –NO 0 and Fe II –NO 0, respectively, mirroring our previous findings on heme-nitrosyl complexes. A trigonal-bipyramidal S = 1 {FeNO} 8 complex with an equatorial triscarbene ligand set appears best described as a resonance hybrid of Fe I –NO 0 and Fe II –NO – . Reduction to the corresponding S = 1/2 {FeNO} 9 state was found to involve both the metal and the NO, leading to an essentially Fe I –NO – complex. Further reduction to the {FeNO} 10 state was found to be primarily metal-centered, leading to a predominantly Fe 0 –NO – configuration. Based on the weights w i of the [π*(NO)] i resonance forms, an overall DMRG-CASSCF-based π*(NO) occupation number could be derived, which was found to exhibit a linear correlation with both the NO bond distance and NO stretching frequency, allowing a readout of the NO oxidation state from the NO bond distance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: