Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 1, 1996Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen Access

Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JEJohan Van EldereCentre for European Policy StudiesLJLieke JoostenRadboud University NijmegenVVVincent Verhaeghe

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Eldere et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f6fb25671bbf00bc291a5https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.4.842-847.1996
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patterns of in vitro activity of itraconazole and imidazole antifungal agents against Candida albicans with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole from Spain1995 · 35 citations
  2. 2Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommended broth macrodilution testing of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine1995 · 129 citations
  3. 3Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution, and E test antifungal susceptibility tests for fluconazole1994 · 109 citations
  4. 4Defining conditions for microbroth antifungal susceptibility tests: influence of RPMI and RPMI-2% glucose on the selection of endpoint criteria1995 · 52 citations
  5. 5Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: a Turbidimetric Technique Independent of Inoculum Size1976 · 142 citations