Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The optical absorption, luminescence, and excitation spectra of LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 doped with chromium impurities are examined as a function of temperature. Several interesting differences between these spectra and those of other chromium-doped oxides are noted. The most important differences are the large halfwidth of the Cr3+-ion “R” lines (∼50 cm−1 at 4.2°K) and the absence of any “R”-line luminescence down to 4.2°K. Instead, a broadband emission peaking at about 1 μ is observed. It is shown that these differences arise from the low value of the crystal-field parameter Dq at the Cr3+-ion site in LiNbO3 and LiTaO3, so that the zero-phonon T24 state of the Cr3+ ion lies at a lower energy than the E2 state. Point-charge calculations of Dq for several oxides, including LiNbO3 and LiTaO3, and other considerations suggest that the most probable sites of the Cr3+-ion impurities are the Nb/Ta sites and not the Li sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. M. Glass (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: