Why the study?
Does continuous dextran infusion to maintain central venous pressure alter carotid baroreflex resetting during prolonged exercise?
Does continuous dextran infusion to maintain central venous pressure alter carotid baroreflex resetting during prolonged exercise?
Progressive resetting of the carotid baroreflex during prolonged exercise renders it ineffectual in counteracting the continued decrement in mean arterial pressure, independent of central venous pressure maintenance.
Volume maintenance attenuates MAP decline during prolonged exercise without affecting baroreflex resetting; leaves open whether CVP modulates resetting in other contexts.
The present investigation was designed to uncouple the hemodynamic physiological effects of thermoregulation from the effects of a progressively increasing central command activation during prolonged exercise. Subjects performed two 1-h bouts of leg cycling exercise with 1) no intervention and 2) continuous infusion of a dextran solution to maintain central venous pressure constant at the 10-min pressure. Volume infusion resulted in a significant reduction in the decrement in mean arterial pressure seen in the control exercise bout (6.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 11.6+/- 1.3 mmHg, respectively). However, indexes of central command such as heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion rose to a similar extent during both exercise conditions. In addition, the carotid-cardiac baroreflex stimulus-response relationship, as measured by using the neck pressure-neck suction technique, was reset from rest to 10 min of exercise and was further reset from 10 to 50 min of exercise in both exercise conditions, with the operating point being shifted toward the reflex threshold. We conclude that the progressive resetting of the carotid baroreflex and the shift of the reflex operating point render the carotid-cardiac reflex ineffectual in counteracting the continued decrement in mean arterial pressure that occurs during the prolonged exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norton et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: