Experimental study demonstrates improved fuel properties and reduced emissions with a 50:50 waste oil blend in diesel engines, suggesting a viable waste-to-energy alternative.
This study explores the potential of enhancing waste rubber pyrolysis oil (WRPO) by blending it with biodiesel derived from used cooking oil (WCO biodiesel oil) to improve its suitability as an alternative biofuel. The hypothesis posits that such blending will improve fuel stability, reduce acidity, and enhance combustion efficiency. The methodology included fuel characterization, preparation of various blending ratios, and evaluation of fuel properties, engine performance, and emissions. WRPO was found to contain high levels of aromatic and oxygenated compounds, resulting in high acidity (0.48 mg KOH/g), low viscosity (1.93 cSt), and a reduced heating value (44.39 MJ/kg). In contrast, WCO biodiesel oil exhibited strong ester characteristics, contributing to improved combustion and stability. Blending WRPO with WCO biodiesel oil at a 50:50 ratio (P50:B50 blend) enhanced fuel properties, including a density of 895 kg/m 3 , reduced viscosity (3.28 cSt), and a lower acid value (0.26 mg KOH/g), along with an increased heating value of 45.60 MJ/kg—approaching that of conventional diesel. Engine testing showed improved torque and reduced brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) compared to pure WRPO. Emission analysis revealed reductions in CO (18.5 %), HC (23.7 %), and smoke opacity (16.2 %), while NO x emissions remained below diesel levels due to the lower combustion temperature of WRPO. These results suggest that the P50:B50 blend effectively addresses the drawbacks of WRPO, offering a promising, sustainable alternative to conventional diesel through improved performance, reduced emissions, and waste-to-energy valorization. • Blending WRPO with biodiesel improves fuel stability and combustion efficiency. • P50:B50 blend achieves optimal density, viscosity, and acid value balance. • Engine performance shows higher torque and reduced brake-specific fuel consumption. • Emission analysis reveals lower CO, HC, and NO x compared to pure WRPO. • Blending supports waste-to-energy initiatives and enhances fuel sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moonsin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: