Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chitosan extracted from Labeo rohita fish scales via chemical demineralization, deproteinization, and deacetylation yields 25% overall from raw scales. The chitosan has 88%-90% deacetylation, a molecular weight (MW) of 109.5 kDa, and low residual ash (0.1%) and protein (0.29%). Composite films (CGP) with fixed gelatin: polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, 10:5) and varying chitosan (1%-7% w/v) are prepared. FTIR confirms cross‑linking; SEM shows smooth surfaces for CGP 3% and CGP 5%, but rougher texture for CGP 7%. Water uptake decreases with higher chitosan content (160% for CGP 1% vs. 22% for CGP 7%). PBS buffer uptake is highest for CGP 1%-5% (80%-120%), and lowest for CGP 7% (∼40%). Lower chitosan content slows degradation. Tensile strength increases with chitosan concentration (27 MPa for CGP 1% to 32.8 MPa for CGP 7%), while elongation at break decreases (13% to 4%). Antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus is strongest for CGP 3% and CGP 5% (inhibition zones 13-14 mm), outperforming pure chitosan. In the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET‑CAM) assay, CGP 3% induces the highest angiogenic response (27.2 ± 0.3 vs. 12.9 ± 0.6 vessels in control), with no toxicity. CGP 3% and CGP 5% are optimal for wound‑healing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aftab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: