Why the study?
Does the integration of TnI, CK-MB, and WMSI improve the positive predictive value for acute coronary syndrome in patients with elevated TnI and ECG changes?
Does the integration of TnI, CK-MB, and WMSI improve the positive predictive value for acute coronary syndrome in patients with elevated TnI and ECG changes?
Elevated troponin I is not always synonymous with acute coronary syndrome, and integrating it with CK-MB and echocardiography improves diagnostic accuracy and prevents inappropriate coronary care unit admissions.
May enhance PPV for stenosis in troponin-positive patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
In Brief Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of troponin I (TnI) elevation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED). Methods We retrospectively studied 166 patients with elevated TnI and electrocardiographic (ECG) change consistent with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. They were transferred from the ED to our coronary care unit (CCU) to undergo coronary angiography. Results Significant coronary stenosis were identified in 101 (61%) of patients. The other 65 patients were found to have different cardiac diseases (n=52) and in 13 patients diagnoses were not even related to the cardiovascular system. Wall motion abnormalities were assessed by echocardiographic wall motion score index (WMSI). Positive predictive value (PPV) of TnI varied from 53 to 65% for higher progressive values of the biomarker. The following PPVs were then calculated: PPV(TnI+CK-MB)=64%; PPV(TnI+WMSI)=72%, PPV(TnI+CK-MB+WMSI)=74%. Conclusions Abnormal values of TnI were detected in a variety of diseases not related to ACS. Even if troponin release indicates myocardial injury, it is not always synonymous with infarction or ischemia. A misinterpretation of TnI elevation may give rise to a diagnostic dilemma and cause unnecessary morbidity. An integration of biomarkers (TnI and CK-MB), ECG and WMSI will help identify false-positive ACS patients and avoid inappropriate admissions to CCU. Troponins are the most specific markers of myocardial injury, but are not always synonymous of an ischemic mechanism of injury. Troponin increases may be observed in various clinical settings different than acute coronary syndrome and a misinterpretation of its rise may cause inappropriate diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucciarelli‐Ducci et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: