Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Eu(3+) co-doped Y(2)O(3):Tb nanoparticles were prepared by the combustion method and characterized for their structural and luminescence properties as a function of annealing temperatures and relative concentration of Eu(3+) and Tb(3+) ions. For Y(2)O(3):Eu,Tb nanoparticles annealed at 600 and 1200 °C, variation in the relative intensity of excitation transitions between the (7)F(6) ground state and low spin and high spin 4f(7)5d(1) excited states of Tb(3+) is explained due to the combined effect of distortion around Y(3+)/Tb(3+) in YO(6)/TbO(6) polyhedra and the size of the nanoparticles. Increase in relative intensity of the 285 nm peak (spin-allowed transition denoted as peak B) with respect to the 310 nm peak (spin-forbidden transition denoted as peak A) with decrease of Tb(3+) concentration in the Y(2)O(3):Eu,Tb nanoparticles heated at 1200 °C is explained based on two competing effects, namely energy transfer from Tb(3+) to Eu(3+) ions and quenching among the Tb(3+) ions. Back energy transfer from Tb(3+) to Eu(3+) in these nanoparticles is found to be very poor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukherjee et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: