Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Mode I fracture energy of a polyurethane adhesive with low Young’s modulus was investigated. Metal adherends in standardized double cantilever beam (DCB) tests are typically too stiff for soft adhesives, making it difficult to measure the fracture energy accurately. However, soft adhesives, such as a single-component polyurethane adhesive tested in this paper, are in high demand in the automobile industry. Thus, accurate measurement techniques must be established. Flexible substrates composed of spring steel were used for the DCB tests to accommodate the deformation of the adhesive layer. First, the applicability of the flexible substrates was discussed using specimens bonded with an epoxy adhesive. For soft adhesives, however, the deformation of the adhesive layer must be considered in the calculation methods of the fracture energy. Although the deformation effect on the DCB tests has been discussed with Winkler’s elastic foundation, the crack length must be measured along with the load and displacement. To overcome the difficulty of measuring the crack length, a calculation method based on Winkler’s elastic foundation was introduced applying the compliance-based beam method (CBBM). Finally, the fracture energy of the polyurethane adhesive was discussed by comparing the calculation methods with and without measuring the crack length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekiguchi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: