Why the study?
The study aimed to describe the overall prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults, including arterial stiffness and physical inactivity.
The overall prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in this Portuguese primary care cohort was high, with 71% having dyslipidaemia, 51% being physically inactive, and 31% having augmented arterial stiffness.
May inform primary care risk screening; leaves open causal validation in prospective studies.
Purpose The study aims to describe the adult’s overall cardiovascular disease risk factors prevalence, including arterial stiffness and physical inactivity. Methods The cross-sectional study involved 197 adults (males: 42%; mean age: 47 ± 13 years) from a Portuguese health centre. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors were measured during clinical assessment. Arterial stiffness was evaluated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (≥ 10 m/s). Physical inactivity (< 30 min/day of moderate to vigorous physical activity) was objectively assessed with accelerometry. The statistical procedures included descriptive analysis (means, medians, and frequencies) and between-gender comparisons (chi-square test and t-test) for cardiovascular disease risk factors. Results Cardiovascular disease risk factors prevalence was as follows: dyslipidaemia: 71%, physical inactivity: 51%, hypertension: 43%, metabolic syndrome: 36%, arterial stiffness: 31%, smoking: 29%, and obesity: 20%. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors increases with age and is higher in males than in females. The prevalence of hypertension and metabolic syndrome was higher in participants with a lower educational level. The majority of hypertensive patients were more physically inactive (56.5%) than active (43.5%; p = 0.044). Conclusions The overall prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors was high, with 1/3 having augmented arterial stiffening and half being physically inactive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohn et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: