The accuracies of CAD models for suspended and inverted microstrip are examined, and new models are proposed. The models are compared over the range of 0.1/spl les/w/h/spl les/10 and for /spl epsiv//sub r/ values of 3.78 and 12.9. Of the three models examined, the Tomar and Bhartia (T&B) model is shown to be the most accurate. For /spl epsiv//sub r/=12.9 (the worst case), the T&B model shows maximum and average errors of 2.94 and 1.28% respectively over its valid range. New CAD models are presented which demonstrate significantly improved accuracy and range of convergence. For suspended and inverted microstrip, the new models demonstrate worst case errors of 0.65 and 1.02%, respectively, and average errors of 0.23 and 0.27%, respectively. Further, the new models are valid for the full 0.1/spl les/w/h/spl les/10 range, and unlike the other models, converge for the limiting cases of either complete substrate filling or a zero thickness substrate.>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J.M. Schellenberg (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: