Why the study?
Does ACE inhibition improve cognitive performance and alter neurochemical profiles in animal models?
Does ACE inhibition improve cognitive performance and alter neurochemical profiles in animal models?
ACE inhibition improves performance in animal models of learning, potentially by removing inhibitory tone on central acetylcholine release or affecting central catecholaminergic function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support clinical use of ACE inhibitors for cognition; leaves open translation from animal models to humans.
In these studies, we have investigated possible cognition-enhancing effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, and putative neurochemical correlates for these actions. In a mouse habituation model, ACE inhibitors improved basal performance and antagonized scopolamine-induced deficits. The performance of aged mice and those with lesions of the nucleus basalis was also improved. ACE inhibition also improved scopolamine-impaired performance of rats in a swim-maze model. Neurochemical studies showed that a low dose (10 micrograms/kg i.p.) of ceranapril caused significant alterations in ex vivo rat brain catecholamine levels in the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and septum. In further studies, angiotensin II (Ang II) was shown to decrease potassium-stimulated [3H] acetylcholine release from slices of rat entorhinal and human temporal cortex, an effect that could be antagonized by the angiotensin receptor antagonist [1-sar,8-thr]Ang II. It is concluded that ACE inhibition can improve both basal and impaired performance in animal models of learning, and that this improvement may be in part a consequence of the removal by ACE inhibition of an inhibitory tone on central acetylcholine release, and/or an effect on central catecholaminergic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barnes et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: