Why the study?
SGLT2 inhibition reduces CV events and left ventricular mass index in T2DM, but its impact on right ventricular remodeling was unknown.
Does empagliflozin improve right ventricular parameters and function in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease?
Does empagliflozin improve right ventricular parameters and function in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease?
In patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease with normal baseline right ventricular function, 6 months of empagliflozin did not significantly alter right ventricular mass or volumes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empagliflozin leaves RV mass, volumes, and function unchanged in T2DM with CAD; challenges uniform reverse remodeling and leaves differential LV-RV effects open.
Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and is associated with a reduction in left ventricular (LV) mass index. However, the impact on right ventricular (RV) remodeling is unknown. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to assess the impact of SGLT2 inhibition on RV parameters and function in T2DM and coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods In EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6, 97 patients with T2DM and CAD were randomly assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 49) once daily or placebo (n = 48). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and after 6 months. RV mass index (RVMi), RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index (RVEDVi, RVESVi) and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) were assessed in blinded fashion. Results At baseline, mean RVMi (± SD) (11.8 ± 2.4 g/m 2 ), RVEF (53.5 ± 4.8%), RVEDVi (64.3 ± 13.2 mL/m 2 ) and RVESVi (29.9 ± 6.9 mL/m 2 ) were within normal limits and were similar between the empagliflozin and placebo groups. Over 6 months, there were no significant differences in RVMi (− 0.11 g/m 2 , [95% CI − 0.81 to 0.60], p = 0.76), RVEF (0.54%, [95% CI − 1.4 to 2.4], p = 0.58), RVEDVi (− 1.2 mL/m 2 , [95% CI − 4.1 to 1.7], p = 0.41) and RVESVi (− 0.81 mL/m 2 , [95% CI − 2.5 to 0.90], p = 0.35) in the empaglifozin group as compared with the placebo group. In both groups, there was no significant correlation between RVMi and LVMi changes from baseline to 6 months. Conclusions In this post-hoc analysis, SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin had no impact on RVMi and RV volumes in patients with T2DM and CAD. The potentially differential effect of empagliflozin on the LV and RV warrants further investigation. Clinical Trial Registration : URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02998970?cond=NCT02998970&draw=2&rank=1 . Unique identifier: NCT02998970.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarak et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: