Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measurements of net fluxes of CO 2 and O 2 from leaves and chlorophyll a fluorescence were used to determine the role of mitochondrial respiration during nitrate (NO 3 – ) assimilation in both a C 3 (wheat) and a C 4 (maize) plant. Changes in the assimilatory quotient (net CO 2 consumed over net O 2 evolved) when the nitrogen source was shifted from NO 3 – to NH 4 + (Δ AQ ) provided a measure of shoot NO 3 – assimilation. According to this measure, elevated CO 2 inhibited NO 3 – assimilation in wheat but not maize. Net O 2 exchange under ambient CO 2 concentrations increased in wheat plants receiving NO 3 – instead of NH 4 + , but gross O 2 evolution from the photosynthetic apparatus ( J O2 ) was insensitive to nitrogen source. Therefore, O 2 consumption within wheat photosynthetic tissue (ΔΟ 2 ), the difference between J O2 and net O 2 exchange, decreased during NO 3 – assimilation. In maize, NO 3 – assimilation was insensitive to changes in intercellular CO 2 concentration ( C i ); nonetheless, ΔΟ 2 at low C i values was significantly higher in NO 3 – ‐fed than in NH 4 + ‐fed plants. Changes in O 2 consumption during NO 3 – assimilation may involve one or more of the following processes: ( a ) Mehler ascorbate peroxidase (MAP) reactions; ( b ) photorespiration; or ( c ) mitochondrial respiration. The data presented here indicates that in wheat, the last process, mitochondrial respiration, is decreased during NO 3 – assimilation. In maize, NO 3 – assimilation appears to stimulate mitochondrial respiration when photosynthetic rates are limiting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cousins et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: