Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compared the Ca(2+) channels activated by endothelin-1 (ET-1) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing endothelin type A (ET(A)) or endothelin type B (ET(B)) receptors using the Ca(2+) channel blockers LOE-908 and SK&F-96365. In both CHO-ET(A) and CHO-ET(B), ET-1 at 0.1 nM activated the Ca(2+)-permeable nonselective cation channel-1 (NSCC-1), which was sensitive to LOE-908 and resistant to SK&F-96365. ET-1 at 1 nM activated NSCC-2 in addition to NSCC-1; NSCC-2 was sensitive to both LOE-908 and SK&F-96365. ET-1 at 10 nM activated the same channels as 1 nM ET-1 in both cell types, but in CHO-ET(A), it additionally activated the store-operated Ca(2+) channel (SOCC), which was resistant to LOE-908 and sensitive to SK&F-96365. Up to 1 nM ET-1, the level of the formation of inositol phosphates (IPs) was low and similar in both cell types, but, at 10 nM ET-1, it was far greater in CHO-ET(A) than in CHO-ET(B). These results show that, in CHO-ET(A) and CHO-ET(B), ET-1 up to 10 nM activated the same Ca(2+) entry channels: 0.1 nM ET-1 activated NSCC-1, and ET-1 > or = 1 nM activated NSCC-1 and NSCC-2. Notably, in CHO-ET(A), 10 nM ET-1 activated SOCCs because of the higher formation of IPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawanabe et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: