This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Mathematical libraries are typically developed for use with the fixed-width data-paths on processors and target common floating-point formats such as IEEEbinary32andbinary64. To address the increasing energy consumption and throughput requirements of HPC, scientific computing and AI applications, libraries and hardware implementations now provide new floating-point formats, allowing mathematical function evaluations with different performance and accuracy trade-offs. In this article we present a methodology and its associated proof-of-concept tool to evaluate the benefits of custom accuracy of mathematical library calls in HPC and scientific computations. First, our tool collects for each call-site of a mathematical function the input- and output-data profile. Then, using a heuristic exploration algorithm, we estimate the minimal required accuracy by rounding the result to lower precisions. The data profile and accuracy measurement per call-site is used to speculatively select the mathematical function implementation with the most appropriate accuracy for a given scenario. We have tested the methodology with the IntelMKLVector Math (VM) library, leveraging the predefined accuracy levels. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach on two real-world applications:SGP4, a satellite tracking application, andPATMOS, a Monte Carlo neutron transport code. The robustness of the methodology is estimated by measuring the numerical accuracy of the resulting optimized code, against user-defined criteria. We experiment and discuss generalization across data-sets and finally propose a speculative runtime implementation forPATMOS. The experiment provides an insight into the performance improvements achievable by leveraging the control of per-function call-site accuracy-mode execution of the Intel compilerSVMLlibrary. We show benefits from 13 to 55 percent in time reduction for thePATMOSuse case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brun et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: