Why the study?
To assess the recovery of cardiac autonomic control system responses to the modified tilt-test during rehabilitation in children in the subacute phase after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.
Does an individually tailored rehabilitation program improve the cardiac autonomic control system response to a modified tilt-test in children post moderate-severe TBI?
Does an individually tailored rehabilitation program improve the cardiac autonomic control system response to a modified tilt-test in children post moderate-severe TBI?
May support CACS monitoring in subacute pediatric TBI rehab; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the recovery of the cardiac autonomic control system (CACS) response to the modified tilt-test during rehabilitation, in children post moderate-severe TBI at the subacute phase post-injury. METHOD: Thirty-seven children aged 6-18 years, 14-162 days post moderate-severe TBI, participated in the study. The assessment included CACS values evaluation (heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure) during the modified tilt-test: five minutes lying supine and five minutes passive standing. Re-assessment was performed after eight weeks of rehabilitation. RESULTS: In both assessments, only four children reported symptoms associated with orthostatic intolerance during the modified tilt-test. No change was found over time in the HR and HRV values at rest. In response to the modified tilt-test, the systolic blood pressure showed change over time, with a significant interaction effect (p=0.04); while in the first assessment the SBP values showed a hypertension trend in the second assessment the SBP values showed a hypotension trend. CONCLUSIONS: Children post moderate-severe TBI at the sub-acute phase post-injury, have a better systolic blood pressure response during the modified tilt-test after eight weeks of individually tailored rehabilitation program, despite no change in the CACS values at rest. CLINICAL TRIAL GOV. NUMBER: NCT03215082.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sorek et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: