Why the study?
Does argatroban reduce the composite end point of death, amputation, and new thrombosis compared to historical controls in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia?
Population
Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT with thrombosis (HITTS)
Comparison
Argatroban vs Historical controls
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support argatroban consideration in HIT; leaves open randomized confirmation versus contemporary controls.
Does argatroban reduce the composite end point of death, amputation, and new thrombosis compared to historical controls in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia?
Argatroban improves clinical outcomes in patients with HIT and HITTS compared with historical controls and offers practical advantages in dosing, monitoring, and reversibility.
Kondo et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: