Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of international water law applicable to the use of waters in transboundary rivers has lasted most of the twentieth century. During this time legal ideas have evolved substantially but widespread agreement has been difficult to obtain since the establishment of the Helsinki Rules in 1966. Following further work by the International Law Commission a framework convention was devised by the UN, which was accepted by the General Assembly in 1997. This convention has the advantage of being broad in concept and encompassing all aspects associated with water use. However, at the same time this is a serious weakness which will limit its utility as a working document by permitting the riparian states in dispute to engage in almost endless discussion over all the factors which might be considered. To help focus the debate this paper suggests two 'rules' that can be used initially to allocate actual water amounts in the basin of a transboundary river. From this position a more detailed water allocation policy can follow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Beaumont (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: