My goal was to assess the validity and reliability of a Cantonese version of the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). To do so, I invited four translators to produce a proper Cantonese translation of the CDLQI. I asked five children to complete this version and made adjustments as necessary. I then requested 30 children with skin problems and 30 children consulting for problems unrelated to the skin in a primary care setting to complete the questionnaire before their consultation. A physician assessed the severity of the skin problem using a visual analog scale. Some children from both groups completed the questionnaire again 7 days later. The CDLQI scores are strongly (gammas = 0.850) and significantly (p < 0.01) correlated with physician-rated disease severity. The Cantonese CDLQI scores were similar to those of the English version for individual skin problems. Correlation of test-retest results is strong (gammas = 0.958, p < 0.01). Cronbach's alpha is 0.83. I concluded that the Cantonese CDLQI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the effects of skin problems on quality of life in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonio Chuh (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: