Why the study?
Agreement between non-invasive finger-cuff pulse pressure variation and arterial catheter-derived pulse pressure variation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery is unknown.
Does non-invasive finger-cuff measurement of pulse pressure variation agree with arterial catheter measurement in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery?
Does non-invasive finger-cuff measurement of pulse pressure variation agree with arterial catheter measurement in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery?
Non-invasive finger-cuff measurement of pulse pressure variation shows only moderate absolute and predictive agreement with arterial catheter measurements in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is a dynamic cardiac preload variable used to predict fluid responsiveness. PPV can be measured non-invasively using innovative finger-cuff systems allowing for continuous arterial pressure waveform recording, e.g., the Nexfin system [BMEYE B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands; now Clearsight (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA)] (PPV Finger ). However, the agreement between PPV Finger and PPV derived from an arterial catheter (PPV ART ) in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery is unknown. We compared PPV Finger and PPV ART at 6 time points in 60 obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery in a secondary analysis of a prospective method comparison study. We used Bland–Altman analysis to assess absolute agreement between PPV Finger and PPV ART . The predictive agreement for fluid responsiveness between PPV Finger and PPV ART was evaluated across three PPV categories (PPV < 9%, PPV 9–13%, PPV > 13%) as concordance rate of paired measurements and Cohen’s kappa. The overall mean of the differences between PPV Finger and PPV ART was 0.5 ± 4.6% (95%-LoA − 8.6 to 9.6%) and the overall predictive agreement was 72.4% with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.53. The mean of the differences was − 0.7 ± 3.8% (95%-LoA − 8.1 to 6.7%) without pneumoperitoneum in horizontal position and 1.1 ± 4.8% (95%-LoA − 8.4 to 10.5%) during pneumoperitoneum in reverse-Trendelenburg position. The absolute agreement and predictive agreement between PPV Finger and PPV ART are moderate in obese patients having laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Caution advised using finger-cuff PPV in obese patients; leaves open agreement with arterial PPV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flick et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: