Why the study?
Hypertension is becoming increasingly prevalent in China, but its status in Guangxi remains unclear.
Hypertension is highly prevalent in the Guangxi region of China, but awareness, treatment, and control rates remain remarkably low, highlighting the need for region-specific public health interventions.
Low control rates (3.6%) in Guangxi signal urgent need for local screening; leaves open optimal ethnicity-specific strategies.
Hypertension (HTN) is getting more prevalent in China, but the HTN's status in Guangxi remains unclear. Our study started from 2013 to 2015 and was dedicated to better acknowledging the status of HTN in Guangxi. The study enrolled 17,100 residents aged ≥ 15 years across Guangxi, from 2013 to 2015, using a stratified multistage random sampling method. Parameters including blood pressure (BP), height, and weight were measured by validated devices. HTN was defined as the average systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or average diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg, or any usage of antihypertensive medications within two weeks. The awareness, treatment, and control were defined as a self-reported history of HTN, a self-reported current usage of antihypertensive medications, and a BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg, respectively. The age and sex-standardized prevalence, awareness, treatment, control rates of HTN for the population aged ≥ 15 years in Guangxi were 15.80%, 16.48%, 11.99%, 3.62%, respectively. Prevalence and control rates were the same for men and women (P > 0.05), while women's awareness and treatment rates were higher than those of men (P < 0.05). Zhuang nationality had a higher prevalence than Han (23.50% vs. 20.35%, P < 0.001), while Han had higher awareness, treatment, control rates (37.39% vs. 31.22%, 30.59% vs. 22.37%, 8.99% vs. 4.55%, individually, P < 0.05). HTN was prevalent in Guangxi, while the awareness, treatment, control rates were adverse. Region-specific strategies to intervene in HTN were needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: