Why the study?
Can streptococcal antibody tests (ASO, anti-DNAse B, and A-antibody) differentiate rheumatic from non-rheumatic mitral disease in children?
Can streptococcal antibody tests (ASO, anti-DNAse B, and A-antibody) differentiate rheumatic from non-rheumatic mitral disease in children?
The A-antibody test, when used in conjunction with ASO and anti-DNAse B, is of potential value in differentiating rheumatic from non-rheumatic mitral disease in children.
May support adjunctive A-antibody testing to differentiate rheumatic from nonrheumatic mitral disease in children; leaves open prospective validation.
The usefulness of streptococcal antibody tests — anti-streptolysin O (ASO), anti-desoxyribonuclease B (anti-DNAse B), and anti-group A carbohydrate (A-antibody) — in differentiating rheumatic from non-rheumatic mitral disease was explored. Sera from 154 children with mitral disease were studied. Fifteen of 17 patients with chronic mitral insufficiency (MI) following acute rheumatic fever manifested persistence of elevated A-antibody levels following the decline of ASO and anti-DNAse B titers to normal 18-36 months after their acute illness. This antibody pattern was not observed among sera from 35 patients with congenital mitral valve deformities. Serologic study of 71 children with mitral disease of obscure etiology identified three groups: subgroup A includes those 12 who demonstrated the antibody pattern associated with rheumatic MI, while subgroup B is comprised of 39 children with normal A-antibody levels. Twenty patients (subgroup C) manifested evidence of recent streptococcal infection. These data suggest that the use of the A-antibody test in conjunction with other streptococcal antibody tests is of potential value in differentiating rheumatic from non-rheumatic mitral disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shulman et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: