Why the study?
What are the independent predictors of cardiovascular risk markers in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome?
What are the independent predictors of cardiovascular risk markers in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome?
PCOS is a strong, independent predictor of subclinical inflammation (elevated hs-CRP), suggesting increased cardiovascular risk in these patients regardless of obesity or insulin resistance.
May warrant CV risk assessment in PCOS; leaves open whether inflammation-targeted interventions alter prognosis.
We aimed to determine the independent predictors of cardiovascular risk in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Ninety-one PCOS and 51 control patients were enrolled to our prospective cross sectional case-control study. In early follicular phase hormonal and lipid profile, fasting insulin and CRP (hs-CRP) levels and glucose levels on fasting and 2 h after the 75 g glucose intake were determined. Insulin resistance (IR) was evaluated with homeostasis model assessment and free testosterone was determined with free androgen index. PCOS was found to be associated with dyslipidemia, hyperandrogenism, IR and sub-clinical inflammation. The prevalence of overweight-obesity (41.8% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.038), IR (42.9% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.035) and glucose intolerance (15.38% vs. 1.96%, p = 0.043) were significantly higher in PCOS compared to control group. Independent predictors of the risk of elevated hs-CRP level were PCOS status (OR = 5, 95% CI: 1.55-16.14, p = 0.007) and high BMI (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.2, p = 0.022) and high BMI (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.05-1.4, p = 0.007) and of TC/HDL ratio was high BMI (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.4, p = 0.009) and increasing age (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.2, p = 0.04). The presence of PCOS, independent from obesity and IR, is the strongest predictor of elevated hs-CRP level. Obesity and advanced age further increases the cardiovascular risk in PCOS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Türkçüoğlu et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: