Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and position emission tomography (PET) are the two main imaging modalities in nuclear medicine. SPECT imaging is more widely available than PET imaging and the radionuclides used for SPECT are easier to prepare and usually have a longer half-life than those used for PET. In addition, SPECT is a less expensive technique than PET. Commonly used gamma emitters are: (99m)Tc (E(max) 141 keV, T (1/2) 6.02 h), (123)I (E(max) 529 keV, T (1/2) 13.0 h) and (111)In (E(max) 245 keV, T (1/2) 67.2 h). Compared to clinical SPECT, PET has a higher spatial resolution and the possibility to more accurately estimate the in vivo concentration of a tracer. In preclinical imaging, the situation is quite different. The resolution of microSPECT cameras (<0.5 mm) is higher than that of microPET cameras (>1.5 mm). In this report, studies on new radiolabelled tracers for SPECT imaging of angiogenesis in tumours are reviewed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dijkgraaf et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: