Why the study?
Does Internet-delivered self-management support improve clinical, lifestyle, and psychological outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease?
Does Internet-delivered self-management support improve clinical, lifestyle, and psychological outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease?
Internet-delivered self-management support interventions show promise in improving lifestyle-related outcomes in CHD patients, though evidence is limited by study heterogeneity and methodological issues.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Internet-delivered CHD self-management support may improve outcomes; leaves open questions on efficacy and implementation in routine care.
INTRODUCTION: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including mental health comorbidity, which is associated with poor outcomes. Self-management is key, but there is limited access to self-management support. Internet-delivered interventions may increase access. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to (1) determine the effectiveness of Internet-delivered CHD self-management support for improving CHD, mood, and self-management related outcomes and (2) identify and describe essential components for effectiveness. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials that met prespecified eligibility criteria were identified using a systematic search of 3 healthcare databases (Medline, PsychINFO, and Embase). RESULTS: Seven trials, which included 1321 CHD patients, were eligible for inclusion. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies in terms of the intervention content, outcomes measured, and study quality. All 7 of the studies reported significant positive between-group effects, in particular for lifestyle-related outcomes. Personalization of interventions and provision of support to promote engagement may be associated with improved outcomes, although more data are required to confirm this. The theoretical basis of interventions was poorly developed though evidence-based behavior change interventions were used. CONCLUSION: More well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed. These should also explore how interventions work and how to improve participant retention and satisfaction and examine the role of personalization and support within interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palacios et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: