Why the study?
CAIPIRINHA is a new technique in abdominal imaging, and the efficacy of the isotropic 3D-VIBE-CAIPIRINHA-DIXON technique on a 3-tesla MR unit in evaluating pancreatic steatosis required investigation.
Does the 3D-VIBE-CAIPIRINHA-DIXON MRI technique effectively evaluate pancreatic steatosis compared to controls?
Does the 3D-VIBE-CAIPIRINHA-DIXON MRI technique effectively evaluate pancreatic steatosis compared to controls?
The 3D-VIBE-CAIPIRINHA-DIXON MRI technique allows for rapid and effective quantitative evaluation of pancreatic steatosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 3D-VIBE-CAIPIRINHA-DIXON technique may aid PS quantification on 3T MRI; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background/aim: CAIPIRINHA is a new technique in abdominal imaging. Pancreatic steatosis (PS) is a subject of increasing scientific interest. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the isotropic 3D-VIBE- CAIPIRINHA -DIXON technique on a new generation 3-tesla MR unit in the evaluation of PS. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, the imaging findings of 49 patients with PS and 41 control subjects were examined. The pancreas-to-spleen ratio (PSR), pancreas-to-muscle ratio (PMR), and pancreatic signal intensity index (PSII) were defined as 3 new parameters and these indexes were calculated from the in-phase/out of phase 3D-VIBE- CAIPIRINHA-DIXON images. Results: The PSR, PMR, and PSII values were significantly different between the patient and control groups (P = 0.001, P = 0.009, P < 0.001, respectively). Statistically significant differences were observed between patient and control groups for ROI measurements of fatty areas on these sequences/images: subtraction (in-out) (P < 0.001), T2W HASTE (P < 0.001), DIXON-fat (P < 0.001), fat-suppressed T1W (P = 0.002), and subtraction (out-in) (P = 0.010). Conclusion: Evaluation of PS with the 3D-VIBE-CAIPIRINHA-DIXON technique can be made rapidly and effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koç et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: