Why the study?
Intraoperative arterial hypotension increases postoperative morbidity and is often treated with norepinephrine, but whether to administer it as a bolus or continuous infusion remains unanswered.
Does continuous infusion of norepinephrine improve macrocirculatory and microcirculatory parameters compared to bolus administration in adult patients with anesthesia-induced hypotension?
Does continuous infusion of norepinephrine improve macrocirculatory and microcirculatory parameters compared to bolus administration in adult patients with anesthesia-induced hypotension?
Continuous infusion of norepinephrine for anesthesia-induced hypotension results in better preservation of cardiac output and improved microcirculatory flow compared to bolus administration.
Mode of norepinephrine for IOH needs clarification; this cohort study leaves optimal bolus versus infusion open for RCTs.
Background: Intraoperative arterial hypotension (IOH) leads to increased postoperative morbidity. Norepinephrine is often use to treat IOH. The question regarding the mode of administration in either a bolus or continuous infusion remains unanswered. The aim of the present study was to describe and compare the effects on macrocirculation and microcirculation of a bolus and a continuous infusion of norepinephrine to treat IOH. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with adult patients who underwent neurosurgery. Patients with invasive arterial blood pressure and cardiac output (CO) monitoring were screened for inclusion. All patients underwent microcirculation monitoring by video-capillaroscopy, laser doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy technology, and tissular CO 2 . In case of IOH, the patient could receive either a bolus of 10 µg or a continuous infusion of 200 µg/h of norepinephrine. Time analysis for comparison between bolus and continuous infusion were at peak of MAP. Results: Thirty-five patients were included, with 41 boluses and 33 continuous infusion. Bolus and continuous infusion induced an maximal increase in mean arterial pressure of +30[20-45] and +23[12-34] %, respectively (P=0,07). For macrocirculatory parameters, continuous infusion was associated with a smaller decrease in CO and stroke volume (p<0.05). For microcirculatory parameters, perfusion index (-12 vs. +12%, p=0,008), microvascular flow index (-0,1 vs. + 0,3, p=0,03), total vessel density (-0,2 vs. +2,3 mm2/mm2, p=0,002), showed significant opposite variations with bolus and continuous infusion, respectively. Conclusions: These results on macro and microcirculation enlighten the potential benefits of a continuous infusion of norepinephrine rather than a bolus to treat anaesthesia-induced hypotension. Trial registration : (NOR-PHARM: 1-17-42 Clinical Trials: NCT03454204), 05/03/2018
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kindermans et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: