Why the study?
End-expiratory occlusion test has been proposed as a preload responsiveness test overcoming limitations of PPV and SVV, but its performance during increased vasomotor tone needed evaluation.
Does the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) predict fluid responsiveness better than stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) during increased vasomotor tone in a rabbit model of hemorrhage?
Does the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) predict fluid responsiveness better than stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) during increased vasomotor tone in a rabbit model of hemorrhage?
The end-expiratory occlusion test maintains its ability to predict fluid responsiveness during increased vasomotor tone induced by phenylephrine, overcoming limitations of pulse pressure and stroke volume variations.
EEOT may retain predictive value during vasopressor tone increase in animal hemorrhage; leaves open human validation before clinical use.
End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been proposed as a preload responsiveness test that overcomes several limitations of pulse pressure (PPV) and stroke volume (SVV) variations. We compared the ability of EEOT versus SVV and PPV to predict fluid responsiveness during the increase of the vasomotor tone in a rabbit model of hemorrhage. Ten rabbits were anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated during basal load (BL), after progressive blood withdrawal (BW), and after volume replacement. Other two sets of data were obtained during vasomotor increase by phenylephrine (PHE) infusion in BL and BW. We estimated the change of stroke volume (∆SV EEOT ) and aortic flow (∆AoF EEOT ) during the EEOT. PPV and SVV were obtained by the variation of beat-to-beat PP and SV, respectively. Baseline PPV, SVV, ∆SV EEOT , and ∆AoF EEOT increased significantly after BW, with a decrease of aortic flow ( P < 0.05). PHE induced a significant decrease of PPV and SVV, but without affecting ∆SV EEOT , and ∆AoF EEOT . We conclude that ∆SV and ∆AoF during EEOT kept the ability to predict fluid responsiveness during PHE infusion in a rabbit hemorrhage model. This result may suggest the advantage of EEOT with respect to SVV and PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness during vasomotor tone increase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouchacourt et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: