August 15, 2011Critical CareOpen Access

Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

368 anesthesiologists

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

MCMaxime CannessonCardiac Imaging GPGunther PestelJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz CRCameron RicksUniversity of California, Irvine

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Persistent underuse of cardiac output monitoring signals an evidence-practice gap; leaves open effective strategies to improve perioperative hemodynamic optimization.

Structured PICO

Population

368 anesthesiologists (active members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] and the European Society of Anaesthesiology [ESA])

Intervention

Survey on current hemodynamic management practices in patients undergoing high-risk surgery

Outcome

Current hemodynamic management practices

There is a considerable gap between evidence supporting perioperative hemodynamic optimization and current clinical practices among North American and European anesthesiologists.

Cite This Study

Cannesson et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f990035aa2c282ce0f104 https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10364

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Persistent underuse of cardiac output monitoring signals an evidence-practice gap; leaves open effective strategies to improve perioperative hemodynamic optimization.

Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider