Why the study?
Can changes in arterial pressure or pulse pressure variation accurately detect volume expansion-induced changes in cardiac output in perioperative patients?
Can changes in arterial pressure or pulse pressure variation accurately detect volume expansion-induced changes in cardiac output in perioperative patients?
Changes in pulse pressure variation, rather than arterial pressure, accurately detect volume expansion-induced changes in cardiac output and have potential clinical applicability in the perioperative period.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support PPV changes over arterial pressure for fluid responsiveness assessment; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) is rarely monitored during surgery, and arterial pressure remains the only hemodynamic parameter for assessing the effects of volume expansion (VE). However, whether VE-induced changes in arterial pressure accurately reflect changes in CO has not been demonstrated. The authors studied the ability of VE-induced changes in arterial pressure and in pulse pressure variation to detect changes in CO induced by VE in the perioperative period. METHODS: The authors studied 402 patients in four centers. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after VE. Response to VE was defined as more than 15% increase in CO. The ability of VE-induced changes in arterial pressure to detect changes in CO was assessed using a gray zone approach. RESULTS: VE increased CO of more than 15% in 205 patients (51%). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for VE-induced changes in systolic, diastolic, means, and pulse pressure ranged between 0.64 and 0.70, and sensitivity and specificity ranged between 52 and 79%. For these four arterial pressure-derived parameters, large gray zones were found, and more than 60% of the patients lay within this inconclusive zone. A VE-induced decrease in pulse pressure variation of 3% or more allowed detecting a fluid-induced increase in CO of more than 15% with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 77% and a gray zone between 2.2 and 4.7% decrease in pulse pressure variation including 14% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Only changes in pulse pressure variation accurately detect VE-induced changes in CO and have a potential clinical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manach et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: