Why the study?
Data on the impact of stress hyperglycemia are limited in non-diabetic patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, particularly in those with multivessel disease.
Does stress hyperglycemia increase the risk of no-reflow and adverse events in non-diabetic patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI?
Does stress hyperglycemia increase the risk of no-reflow and adverse events in non-diabetic patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI?
Stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients with STEMI and multivessel disease is associated with increased no-reflow and short-term adverse events, suggesting complete revascularization during the index procedure may further increase no-reflow risk in this population.
SHG was associated with higher mortality in non-diabetic STEMI-MVD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before informing care.
Background: Stress hyperglycemia (SHG) is related to an increased risk of mortality in diabetic patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, data are limited in non-diabetic patients especially in patients with multivessel disease (MVD). Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, 742 non-diabetic patients with STEMI and MVD were divided into SHG group and non-SHG group. The overall incidence of SHG was 24.9%. The incidence of no-reflow (NR) phenomenon (18.4% vs 11.8%; P = .024) and in-hospital mortality (1.6% vs .2%; P = .020) in SHG group were significantly higher than those in non-SHG group. SHG was associated with 30-day MACE (hazard ratio, 4.265; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.354–13.439; P = .013), but not 1-year. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that SHG (odds ratio: 1.691, 95% CI: 1.072–2.667, P = .024) was an independent predictor of NR. If complete revascularization (CR) was performed during PPCI, the incidence of NR would be significantly higher. Conclusion: In non-diabetic patients with STEMI and MVD, SHG is associated with increased SF-NR and short-term adverse events, and CR during PPCI further increases the risk of NR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: