Why the study?
Can an automated approach using GDA and OSELM accurately detect CHF and CAD from HRV signals?
Can an automated approach using GDA and OSELM accurately detect CHF and CAD from HRV signals?
A machine learning approach using nonlinear HRV features demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between normal sinus rhythm, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid automated CHF/CAD detection; leaves open prospective clinical validation before any practice use.
In this paper, we propose an automated approach that combines the generalized discriminant analysis (GDA) as feature reduction scheme with radial basis function (RBF) kernel and the online sequential extreme learning machine (OSELM) having Sigmoid, Hardlim, RBF and Sine activation function as binary classifier for detection of congestive heart failure (CHF) and coronary artery disease (CAD). For this analysis, 13 nonlinear features as Correlation Dimension (CD), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) as DFA-[Formula: see text]1 and DFA-[Formula: see text]2, Bubble Entropy (BBEn), Sample Entropy (SampEn), Dispersion Entropy (DISEn), Lempel–Ziv Complexity (LZ), Sinai Entropy (SIEn), Improved Multiscale Permutation Entropy (IMPE), Hurst Exponent (HE), Permutation Entropy (PE), Approximate Entropy (ApEn) and Standard Deviation (SD1/SD2) were extracted from Heart Rate Variability (HRV) signals. For validation of proposed method, HRV data were obtained from standard database of normal sinus rhythm (NSR), CHF and CAD subjects. Numerical experiments were done on the combination of database sets such as NSR-CAD, CHF-CAD and NSR-CHF subjects. The simulation results show a clear difference in combination of database sets by using GDA having RBF, Gaussian kernel function and OSELM binary classifier having Sigmoid, RBF and Sine activation function and achieved an accuracy of 98.17% for NSR-CAD, 100% for NSR-CHF and CAD-CHF subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saxena et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: