Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined whether a semistructured interview is valid in predicting training performance in theoretical and simulation examinations and overall training success; which aspects of the interview show incremental validity over cognitive ability tests; and whether additional variables enhance the prediction from the interview. The sample involved data from 337 trainees of the G erman A ir N avigation S ervice P rovider selected by the G erman A erospace C enter and 657 (interview) and 6,885 (cognitive ability) candidates being the corresponding reference samples. Findings indicate incremental validity of the interview over the cognitive ability tests. Additional variables contributed only to the prediction of theoretical examination performance. Attention, general motivation, and social competence predicted the criteria best, particularly the theoretical examination performance and overall training success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conzelmann et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: