Why the study?
Does uninterrupted low-intensity warfarin reduce periprocedural thromboembolic complications and major bleeding compared to standard-intensity warfarin in elderly patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Does uninterrupted low-intensity warfarin reduce periprocedural thromboembolic complications and major bleeding compared to standard-intensity warfarin in elderly patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Uninterrupted low-intensity warfarin (INR 1.5-2.0) appears as safe and effective as standard-intensity warfarin (INR 2.0-2.5) for elderly patients undergoing AF ablation, with a trend toward less minor bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous low-intensity warfarin may be feasible in elderly AF ablation; leaves open optimal intensity pending larger randomized data.
BACKGROUND: No previous studies exist investigating the optimal intensity of uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous low-intensity warfarin therapy throughout the periprocedural period of RFCA for AF in the elderly. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized study. We enrolled AF patients (age ≥ 70 years) who underwent first-time RFCA for AF. Enrolled patients were randomized to group A and group B. The international normalized ratios before ablation were maintained at 1.5 to 2.0 and 2.0 to 2.5 in group A and B, respectively. Primary end points were periprocedural thromboembolic complications and major bleeding. Secondary end points included periprocedural asymptomatic cerebral emboli (ACE) and minor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled in our study (group A: 52; group B: 49). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. Only 1 patient suffered from stroke in group B. No major bleeding events occurred in either group. The incidence of new ACE lesions was comparable between the 2 groups (11.5% vs 8.2%, P = 0.82). Minor bleeding occurred in 1 of 52 (1.9%) patients in group A and in 5 of 49 (10.2%) patients in group B ( P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Uninterrupted low-intensity warfarin for RFCA of AF might be as effective as standard-intensity warfarin in preventing periprocedural thromboembolic complications and might be associated with fewer bleeding events in the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: