Why the study?
Does the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm improve the accuracy of warfarin dose prediction compared to a clinical algorithm in Japanese patients?
Does the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm improve the accuracy of warfarin dose prediction compared to a clinical algorithm in Japanese patients?
The IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm improves the accuracy of warfarin dose prediction in Japanese patients, particularly for identifying those requiring low doses who are at higher risk of overanticoagulation.
May improve warfarin dose prediction accuracy in Japanese patients; extends IWPC data but leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Warfarin dosing is difficult to establish because of considerable interindividual variation. Thus, warfarin pharmacogenetics have attracted particular interest in relation to appropriate control of anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 200 eligible subjects were chosen from participants in a hospital cohort. Performance of a pharmacogenetic algorithm recently developed by the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) was tested and compared with a clinical algorithm (without genotype data) by calculating the percentage of patients for whom the predicted dose deviated by less than 7 mg/week (1 mg/day) from the actual dose. The pharmacogenetic algorithm accurately identified a significantly (P<0.05) larger proportion of patients to achieve the target international normalized ratio than did the clinical algorithm (68% vs 36% for a low-dose group; and 21% vs 0% for a high-dose group). Also, an increase in warfarin dosage was found to be appropriate for the current status of alcohol drinking (4 mg/week, as against non-drinking) and smoking (3.3 mg/week, as against non-smoking). CONCLUSIONS: The IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm has clinical application, particularly in identifying Japanese patients who require a low dosage of warfarin and are at greater risk of excessive anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeuchi et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: