Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous studies of the crystal structure of the ovine prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-1 (PGHS-1)/S-flurbiprofen complex (Picot, D., Loll, P. J., and Garavito, R. M. (1994) Nature 367, 243-249) suggest that the enzyme is associated with membranes through a series of four amphipathic helices located between residues 70 and 117. We have used the photoactivatable, hydrophobic reagent 3-trifluoro-3-(m-[125I]iodophenyl)diazirine ([125I]TID) which partitions into membranes and other hydrophobic domains to determine which domains of microsomal PGHS-1 are subject to photolabeling. After incubation of ovine vesicular gland microsomes with [125I]TID, ovine PGHS-1 was one of the major photolabeled proteins. Proteolytic cleavage of labeled PGHS-1 at Arg277 with trypsin established that [125I]TID was incorporated into both the 33-kDa tryptic peptide containing the amino terminus and the 38-kDa tryptic peptide containing the carboxyl terminus. This pattern of photolabeling was not affected by the presence of 20 mM glutathione, indicating that the photolabeling observed for PGHS-1 was not due to the presence of [125I]TID in the aqueous phase. However, nonradioactive TID as well as two inhibitors, ibuprofen and sulindac sulfide, which bind the cyclooxygenase active site of PGHS-1, prevented the labeling of the 38-kDa carboxyl-terminal tryptic peptide. These results suggest that [125I]TID can label both the cyclooxygenase active site in the tryptic 38-kDa fragment and a membrane binding domain located in the 33-kDa fragment. Cleavage of photolabeled PGHS-1 with endoproteinase Lys-C yielded a peptide containing residues 25-166 which was labeled with [125I]TID. This peptide contains the putative membrane binding domain of ovine PGHS-1. Our results provide biochemical support for the concept developed from the crystal structure that PGHS-1 binds to membranes via four amphipathic helices located near the NH2 terminus of the protein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otto et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: