Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field‐grown soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr., cv. Corsoy] were exposed to O 3 for 7 h daily (0900–1600 CST) for 56 d in open‐top chambers. The air in the chambers was either charcoal‐filtered or non‐filtered, with various constant amounts of O 3 added. The randomized block design incorporated four replicates of six treatments: no chamber (0.042 ppm O 3 seasonal 7‐h average); chamber with charcoal‐filtered air (0.022 ppm O 3 ); and chambers with non‐filtered air plus added O 3 to provide concentrations of 0.042, 0.064, 0.089, and 0.115 ppm. A linear reduction in seed weight per plant with increasing ozone dose ( b (slope) = −87.18) was significant ( P = 0.01), and yields were reduced 5, 23, 39, and 52% for the 0.042, 0.064, 0.089, and 0.115 ppm O 3 treatments, respectively, compared with the 0.022 ppm treatment. Significant ( P = 0.01) linear reductions were also noted for filled pods per plant ( b = 184.4), seeds per filled pod ( b = −0.9955), weight per seed ( b = −0.3794), and percent oil content ( b = −12.33). Significant ( P = 0.01) linear increases were noted for unfilled pods per plant ( b = 58.11) and percent protein content ( b = 20.58). A comparison of the open plots with the nonfiltered air chamber plots provided with the same concentration of O 3 revealed no significant chamber effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kress et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: