Why the study?
Patients with AF and CKD face high stroke risk and difficult anticoagulant selection, with warfarin negatively affecting renal function, creating a need for alternative therapies.
Does rivaroxaban improve safety and preserve kidney function compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease?
Does rivaroxaban improve safety and preserve kidney function compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease?
This review suggests rivaroxaban is an appropriate and renally safer alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and moderate chronic kidney disease.
May inform anticoagulant choice in AF with moderate CKD; leaves open dedicated RCT confirmation before practice change.
This review focuses on issues of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Such patients are at high risk of stroke whereas the choice of an anticoagulant is difficult. A wealth of information about a negative effect of warfarin on the kidney function has accumulated. A need for an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients with stage 3-4 CKD has become imminent. In this regard, rivaroxaban seems to be an appropriate replacement for warfarin in such patients. In randomized, controlled studies that evaluated the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin, the efficacy and safety profile of a "kidney" dose in moderate disorders of kidney function has been studied only for rivaroxaban. Moreover, both randomized, controlled studies and studies performed in the conditions of clinical practice, have demonstrated a more favorable effect of rivaroxaban on kidney function compared to warfarin. Patients with AF associated with CKD require a comprehensive protection, which, according to results of clinical studies, may be provided by rivaroxaban.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Т. N. Novikova (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: