Why the study?
Mutations in FLNC, initially linked to myofibrillar myopathy, have been increasingly identified across distinct and overlapping human cardiomyopathy phenotypes, highlighting the need to understand their role in these diseases.
FLNC mutations are increasingly recognized as a cause of various human cardiomyopathies, highlighting the complex genetic and phenotypic continuum of these diseases and the potential for personalized therapeutics.
Filamin C mutations may drive distinct cardiomyopathy phenotypes; leaves open targeted genetic stratification pending prospective validation.
Over the past decades, there has been tremendous progress in understanding genetic alterations that can result in different phenotypes of human cardiomyopathies. More than a thousand mutations in various genes have been identified, indicating that distinct genetic alterations, or combinations of genetic alterations, can cause either hypertrophic (HCM), dilated (DCM), restrictive (RCM), or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies (ARVC). Translation of these results from "bench to bedside" can potentially group affected patients according to their molecular etiology and identify subclinical individuals at high risk for developing cardiomyopathy or patients with overt phenotypes at high risk for cardiac deterioration or sudden cardiac death. These advances provide not only mechanistic insights into the earliest manifestations of cardiomyopathy, but such efforts also hold the promise that mutation-specific pathophysiology might result in novel "personalized" therapeutic possibilities. Recently, the FLNC gene encoding the sarcomeric protein filamin C has gained special interest since FLNC mutations were found in several distinct and possibly overlapping cardiomyopathy phenotypes. Specifically, mutations in FLNC were initially only linked to myofibrillar myopathy (MFM), but are now increasingly found in various forms of human cardiomyopathy. FLNC thereby represents another example for the complex genetic and phenotypic continuum of these diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eden et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: