Why the study?
The study was conducted to better understand the pathogenicity of current porcine group A rotavirus field strains.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Colostrum-deprived 2-day-old piglets
Comparison
Experimental inoculation with AHBZ2304 (G9P[23]) or AHBZ2303 (G11P[7]) vs control
Design
Animal experimental study
Follow-up
72 h post infection
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both PoRVA isolates induce severe enteritis and villus damage in piglets; leaves open field relevance and vaccine needs.
In order to better understand the pathogenicity of the current porcine A group rotavirus (PoRVA) field strains, AHBZ2304 (G9P[23]) and AHBZ2303 (G11P[7]) isolated from diarrhea suckling piglets were selected for pathogenicity analysis in the present study. Experimental inoculation of colostrum-deprived 2-day-old piglets revealed that both isolates caused severe clinical sings, high level of virus shedding and significant damage to the small intestinal villi. Additionally, both gross and microscopic lung lesions were identified at 72 h post infection (HPI) compared to control. Alterations in the microbiota and the overexpression of inflammatory cytokines may serve as critical mechanisms driving the bowel disease associated with PoRVA infection. Our results are of great significance for understanding the pathogenicity of PoRVA emerged in recent years, highlighting the potential for porcine rotavirus to become epidemic and complex, and necessitating heightened attention of the often-overlooked disease in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: