The study demonstrates a significant yearly shift in the prevalent serotypes of human rotavirus in Thailand, highlighting the dynamic nature of rotavirus epidemiology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ongoing rotavirus surveillance in Thailand; leaves open whether serotype monitoring should guide vaccine strain selection.
A total of 241 group A rotavirus-positive stool samples collected from diarrhoeic patients in Thailand between July 1988 and June 1991 were characterized for their serotypes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies and by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In July 1988-June 1989, serotype 1 was the most prevalent (63.4%), followed by serotype 4 (11.0%) and serotype 2 (8.5%). In July 1989-June 1990, 59.8% were serotype 1, 24.3% were serotype 2, and 6.1% were serotype 3. In contrast, in July 1990-June 1991, serotype 3 was detected in the highest frequency (40.5%), 29.9% were serotype 1, and 27.3% were serotype 2. Thus, a distinct yearly change of serotype distribution of rotavirus in Thailand was observed in the three consecutive years. In particular, it was of note that the prevalence of serotype 3 greatly increased, in contrast to the previous studies in which almost no serotype 3 rotaviruses were detected in the years 1983-8 in Thailand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pongsuwanna et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: