Why the study?
Does elevated baseline ADMA predict fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in a healthy population-based cohort of women?
Does elevated baseline ADMA predict fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in a healthy population-based cohort of women?
Elevated baseline ADMA levels independently predict long-term cardiovascular events and mortality in women, enhancing traditional risk assessment models like SCORE and Framingham.
May refine long-term CVD risk stratification in women; leaves open incremental value over Framingham/SCORE pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) reduces nitric oxide by inhibiting nitric oxide synthase is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our study examined the association of ADMA with CVD prospectively in a healthy population-based cohort of women. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured baseline ADMA of 880 women in the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg using high-performance liquid chromatography. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, creatinine clearance, and homocysteine using Cox models, the HR (95% CI in parentheses) of CVD end points at 24 years for a 0.15 micromol/L (1 SD) increase in ADMA were: all-cause mortality 1.12 (0.96, 1.32), fatal CVD 1.30 (1.04, 1.62), total CVD events 1.29 (1.09, 1.53). The top quintile (ADMA >or=0.71 micromol/L) compared with the bottom four-fifths, conferred a cumulative risk 22 versus 14%, relative risk 1.75 (95% CI 1.18, 2.59) and population attributable risk 12.7% of total CVD events, and further identified individuals who are at higher than expected risk based on the SCORE and Framingham systems. CONCLUSIONS: A 0.15 mumol/L increase in baseline ADMA levels is associated with approximately 30% increase in incident cardiovascular risk at 24 years in women after adjustment. ADMA levels >or=0.71 micromol/L enhances CVD risk assessment in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leong et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: