Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nuclease-resistant alpha anomers of pyrimidine-rich CT- and purine-rich GA- and GT-containing oligonucleotides were investigated for their triplex-forming potential and compared with their corresponding nuclease-sensitive beta anomers. Both 23mer CT-alpha and 23mer CT-beta had quite similar triplex binding affinities. Synthetic 23mer GT-alpha oligonucleotides were capable of triplex formation with binding affinities slightly lower than corresponding 23mer GT-beta oligonucleotides. The orientation of third strand GT-alpha binding was parallel to the purine strand of the duplex DNA target, whereas the orientation of third strand GT-beta binding was found to be antiparallel. Triplex formation with both GT oligonucleotides showed the typical dependence on magnesium and temperature. In contrast, 23mer GA-alpha oligonucleotides did not support triplex formation in either orientation under a variety of experimental conditions, whereas the corresponding 23mer GA-beta oligonucleotides demonstrated strong triplex formation in the antiparallel orientation. GA-alpha oligonucleotides covalently conjugated to acridine were similarly unable to demonstrate triplex formation. GA-alpha oligonucleotides, in contrast to GT-alpha oligonucleotides, were capable of self-association, detectable by gel retardation and UV spectroscopy, but competing self-association could not fully account for the lack of triplex formation. Thus for in vivo triplex gene regulation strategies using GT oligonucleotides the non-natural alpha anomer may be a feasible alternative to the natural beta anomer, allowing for a comparable degree of triplex formation without rapid cellular degradation. However, alpha anomeric inversion does not appear to be a feasible alternative in applications involving GA oligonucleotides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noonberg et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: