Why the study?
Heart failure is a growing global pandemic with high morbidity and mortality, making accurate predictive models essential.
Does a Support Vector Machine model improve accuracy in predicting heart failure mortality compared to an Artificial Neural Network model in a dataset of 299 patients?
Does a Support Vector Machine model improve accuracy in predicting heart failure mortality compared to an Artificial Neural Network model in a dataset of 299 patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A Support Vector Machine model demonstrated superior accuracy (79%) compared to an Artificial Neural Network (77%) in predicting heart failure mortality using a standard clinical dataset.
In recent years, cardiovascular diseases have become increasingly important as a leading cause of death globally. heart failure (HF), a chronic disease affecting some 26 million people worldwide, has become a growing pandemic. Its prevention is a national and global emergency. In India, between 1.3 and 4.6 million adults suffer from HF, and despite advances in therapy and prevention, mortality and morbidity remain high, with significant costs to the healthcare system. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of ML models for predicting HF. The support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were analyzed to determine which model offers superior accuracy. A dataset from the Kaggle platform with x records and x features was used to train the models. The results indicated that the SVM model is the best predictor of HF with an accuracy of 79%, which far exceeds the ANNs with 77%. It is concluded that the machine learning (ML) method known as SVM shows outstanding and effective performance in the task of predicting heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salazar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: