Why the study?
ACS cases without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors have increased, but this population had not been studied in South Asia despite their high baseline risk.
Does the absence of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFless) improve or reduce in-hospital and 5-year mortality in patients presenting with a first episode of acute coronary syndrome?
Does the absence of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFless) improve or reduce in-hospital and 5-year mortality in patients presenting with a first episode of acute coronary syndrome?
In a South Asian cohort, ACS patients presenting without standard modifiable risk factors had similar adjusted in-hospital and 5-year mortality compared to those with at least one risk factor.
Mortality similar between SMuRFless and SMuRF ACS in Pakistan; leaves open mediators of risk and need for prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients without standard modifiable risk factors i.e. hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and tobacco use (SMuRFless) compared to the patients with ≥ 1 SMuRF but this has not been studied in South Asia despite them being a high-risk population. We conducted a comparative analysis of first episodes of ACS cases admitted to a tertiary cardiac center in Pakistan between SMuRFless and ≥ 1 SMuRF patients for clinical presentation, management, in-hospital, and 5-year mortality. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study and data of 15,051 patients admitted at Tabba Heart Institute (THI) with the first episode of ACS was extracted from Chest Pain-MI™, and the CathPCI Registry® registry affiliated with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®), USA. Logistic regression and Cox proportional algorithm yielded odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for associated factors of in-patient and 5-year mortality. RESULTS: There were 15% SMuRFless cases and in-hospital mortality was 4.1% in SMuRFless vs. 3.9% in the ≥ 1 SMuRF group (p-0.59), the difference remained insignificant after adjusting for age, gender, Killip class, multivessel disease, type of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (Adjusted OR:1.1 [0.8, 1.3]. Unadjusted 5-year mortality was 40% lower in the SMuRFless group but the difference was insignificant after adjusting for age, gender, disease at presentation, its severity, and management (Adjusted HR 0.7 95% CI[0.5, 1.0]). STEMI, NSTEMI, Killip class, and multivessel disease increased the risk of overall 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION: In-hospital and 5-year mortality was not different between the SMuRFless and ≥ 1 SMuRF group, there is a need to understand mediators of immediate and long-term mortality risk in SMuRFless patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheikh et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: