Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of the joule balance method to measure the Planck constant, in support of the redefinition of the kilogram, has been going on at the National Institute of Metrology of China (NIM) since 2007. The first prototype has been built to check the feasibility of the principle. In 2011, the relative uncertainty of the Planck constant measurement at NIM is 7.7 × 10-5. Self-heating and swing of the coils are the main uncertainty contributions. Since 2012, some improvements have been made to reduce these uncertainties. The relative uncertainty of the joule balance is reduced to 7.2 × 10-6at present. The Planck constant measured with the joule balance is h = 6.6261041(470) × 10-34Js. The relative difference between the determined h and the CODATA2010 recommendation value is 5×10-6. Further improvements are still being carried out on the NIM-1 apparatus. At the same time, the design and construction of a brand new and compact joule balance NIM-2 are also in progress and presented here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: