Why the study?
How does bundle branch block affect the sequence and timing of ventricular wall motion assessed by radionuclide cineangiography compared to normal conduction?
How does bundle branch block affect the sequence and timing of ventricular wall motion assessed by radionuclide cineangiography compared to normal conduction?
Radionuclide cineangiography demonstrates that bundle branch blocks cause specific delays in the onset of wall motion in the ipsilateral ventricle.
May inform noninvasive evaluation of ventricular dyssynchrony on cineangiography; leaves open correlation with outcomes or therapeutic response in conduction disease.
We determined the sequence and timing of inward ventricular wall motion by least-square phase analysis of radionuclide cineangiograms in 10 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), five patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 11 patients with normal conduction. All LBBB and RBBB patients had normal coronary arteries and no segmental wall motion abnormalities. The left ventricle (LV) was divided into eight segments and the right ventricle (RV) into three; sequence and timing were scored by three observers. In normal subjects, wall motion begins in either or both ventricles and ends in the LV or both ventricles. In patients with LBBB it begins in the RV and ends in the LV; in patients with RBBB is begins in the LV and ends in the RV or both ventricles. The intraventricular wall motion is also altered in the ventricle ipsilateral to a bundle branch block. In LBBB, the mean time of onset of LV wall motion is delayed 1.9 frames (38 msec), whereas RV wall motion is normal. In RBBB, the onset of RV wall motion is delayed 1.3 frames (26 msec), whereas LV wall motion is not delayed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenbush et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: